UPSC Setu Logo
All PYQ collections
Polity & Governance2026
In a multi-ethnic district where both economic competition and historical grievances frequently led to community tensions, a flashpoint has arisen with a Government decision to allocate land for a waste management facility near a tribal hamlet, sparking protests by the tribal community, which claimed that the land was sacred and critical to their cultural identity. At the same time, urban residents and local industries supported the project, citing severe solid waste challenges and health concerns due to lack of a proper disposal site. The conflict has escalated with road blockades, social media campaigns, and allegations of police excesses. As a responsible Government official, you are tasked with resolving the situation through mediation, ensuring a sustainable outcome that balances environmental needs, tribal rights, and urban public health. Consider the following statements with reference to the above:
  1. A successful conflict resolution process must begin with acknowledging the cultural concerns of the protesting tribal community before discussing technical alternatives.
  2. The Government should move ahead with the project without delay to address urban health concerns, which outweigh the sentiments of a small group.
  3. Creating a multi-stakeholder dialogue platform - including tribal leaders, environmental experts, and municipal representatives - to build mutual understanding and help de-escalate tensions.
  4. Conducting an independent Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and sharing findings transparently with both sides to facilitate evidence-based decision-making.
Which of the statements given above would contribute to the resolution process?

Explanation

The correct option of 1, 3, and 4 emphasizes a holistic approach to conflict resolution, which is crucial in a multi-ethnic context marked by historical grievances. Acknowledging the cultural concerns of the tribal community (statement 1) is essential for building trust and legitimacy, which facilitates more constructive dialogue. Additionally, creating a multi-stakeholder dialogue platform (statement 3) encourages inclusive participation and understanding among all affected parties, thereby reducing tensions. Lastly, conducting an independent Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (statement 4) ensures that decisions are grounded in scientific evidence and addresses both environmental and social dimensions, fostering transparency and accountability in the decision-making process. This balanced approach aligns with principles of participatory governance and sustainable development needed to address complex socio-environmental issues effectively.

Sign in to read the full explanation
Previous QuestionNext Question
New here?